Pick a starting shape
Begin from a template like a founder's first team, a sales pod, or an engineering pod, or start empty and add roles one at a time. Set the quantity for each role you need.
Free tool
Compare modeled US employment cost with Latin America planning rates for talent plus managed staffing support. Add roles, pick a market, then confirm employment charges separately.
Built for founders and operators planning a first nearshore team or a new pod, who want an honest budget before they start hiring.
Team builder
Start from a template or add roles by hand, choose a market and US overhead profile, and compare the modeled rate gap before engagement-specific charges.
Team builder
Start from a template or add roles one at a time, pick a market, and set your US overhead profile. The Latin America side covers talent plus managed staffing support, not every employment charge. Treat the result as a planning comparison, not a quote.
Roles
Most markets sit within one to three hours of US time zones.
Modeled annual team rate gap
$125,400
| Role | Qty | US per year | Nearshore planning rate | Modeled rate gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Assistant | 1 | $72,800 | $25,200 | $47,600 |
| Customer Support Representative | 1 | $63,000 | $23,400 | $39,600 |
| Bookkeeper | 1 | $65,800 | $27,600 | $38,200 |
Why it matters
Looking at one role at a time hides the real opportunity in nearshore hiring. A single seat can show a meaningful planning-rate gap, but that gap must be tested against the employment structure and charges for the chosen market. The picture changes when you model a whole team because role mix, seniority, and support needs compound across seats. Use the result to compare plausible team shapes, then add every payroll, tax, benefit, legal-employer, and compliance charge before approving the budget.
The reason the math works is the same reason a single nearshore hire works, applied at scale. Local labor-market rates across Latin America are generally lower than in major US metros, which can create budget headroom before employment-structure charges. When you build a team through a managed provider, talent and staffing support may be quoted in one monthly planning rate. That rate does not automatically include every payroll, tax, benefit, legal-employer, or country-level compliance charge. The written engagement should itemize those amounts and responsible parties for every market.
This tool starts from a median US base salary for each role, applies the overhead profile you choose so the in-house figure reflects a realistic total cost, then compares that against a typical planning rate for talent plus staffing support, adjusted for the country you pick. It does this for every seat on the team and adds them up. The result is useful for early budgeting, but it is not a binding like-for-like total-cost quote until engagement-specific employment and payroll charges are added.
How it works
Begin from a template like a founder's first team, a sales pod, or an engineering pod, or start empty and add roles one at a time. Set the quantity for each role you need.
Select a Latin America country to reflect local rates and a US overhead profile so the in-house comparison includes taxes, benefits, equipment, and recruiting, not just salary.
The calculator rolls every seat into a planning comparison: modeled US cost, nearshore staffing rate, and the rate gap before engagement-specific employment charges.
Reference table
Based on a standard 40 percent US overhead profile and the Latin America regional average. Load any of these as a template in the calculator above, then adjust the roles and market to fit your plan.
| Team | People | US in-house, per year | Nearshore planning rate, per year | Nearshore planning rate, per month | Modeled annual gap | Rate gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Founder's first team | 3 | $201,600 | $76,200 | $6,350 | $125,400 | 62% |
| Back office pod | 3 | $207,200 | $79,800 | $6,650 | $127,400 | 61% |
| Sales development pod | 4 | $302,400 | $120,000 | $10,000 | $182,400 | 60% |
| Customer support team | 4 | $298,200 | $115,800 | $9,650 | $182,400 | 61% |
| Engineering pod | 5 | $809,200 | $340,800 | $28,400 | $468,400 | 58% |
| Marketing team | 4 | $309,400 | $116,400 | $9,700 | $193,000 | 62% |
The nearshore figures cover talent plus managed staffing support. Add payroll, tax, benefit, legal-employer, and compliance charges from the written engagement before treating the gap as final savings.
By the numbers
50 to 70%
Planning-rate gap before engagement-specific charges
1 to 3 hrs
Time zone offset from US business hours
2 to 4 wks
Common time to a shortlist per role through a managed provider
Team shapes
A first team of an assistant, customer support, and a bookkeeper removes the recurring work that keeps founders out of the things only they can do.
Sales development reps, an appointment setter, and marketing support fill the top of the funnel without the cost of a full US sales floor.
An engineering pod of backend, frontend, and DevOps talent plus a project manager gives a small product team a concrete nearshore planning-rate comparison.
Most teams do not appear all at once. They grow in a sequence that follows the work. The first hire usually protects the founder’s time, because the founder is the most expensive and most constrained resource in any young company. An assistant who owns the inbox, the calendar, travel, and research gives that time back. The second hire tends to protect the customer, since a slow support queue quietly costs revenue and reputation. The third hire often protects the numbers, because a founder doing their own books is a founder not selling or building. The founder’s first team template in the calculator follows exactly this pattern, and it is a sensible starting point even if your order is different.
From there, teams branch based on where they are trying to grow. A company pushing for revenue adds a sales pod: sales development reps to prospect, an appointment setter to book meetings, and a marketing coordinator to keep the funnel fed. A company scaling a product adds an engineering pod: backend and frontend developers, a DevOps engineer, and a project manager to keep delivery moving. A company drowning in tickets adds a support team that covers the queue across the day with a manager owning quality. Each of these is a template you can load, adjust, and price in the calculator, so you can compare the cost of two or three different growth paths before you commit to one.
Markets
Time zone overlap is the quiet advantage of building a team in Latin America. Most of the region works your hours, so a team feels like a team and not a handoff.
Mexico, Costa Rica, and Guatemala align closely with US Central time, which makes them a natural base for a team that needs full overlap with a US workday.
Colombia, Peru, and Ecuador sit on or near US Eastern time and offer deep talent pools for support, finance, marketing, and engineering roles.
Argentina, Chile, and Brazil run a few hours ahead of US Eastern time and are known for strong technical, design, and senior engineering talent.
When you build a team rather than hire one person, time zone fit matters even more. A single contributor twelve hours ahead can work in isolation on clearly scoped tasks. A team needs to talk to each other and to you during the day. That is where Latin America pulls ahead of farther offshore regions. When your people in Mexico City, Bogota, or Buenos Aires are online during your workday, a standup is a standup, a question gets a same-day answer, and a blocker gets cleared before it costs a sprint. That overlap is the reason so many US companies now treat the region as the default place to build support, sales, finance, and engineering teams rather than scatter them across the globe.
The model applies a country adjustment to each combined planning rate for talent plus managed staffing support. Use it to compare one consistent assumption set across team shapes, not as worker pay or a complete engagement cost. Country fit also depends on overlap, role evidence, screening needs, and the separately itemized employment structure.
From budget to team
A team budget is most useful when it becomes a plan. Once the calculator shows a number you can live with, the next step is to sequence the hires rather than try to fill every seat at once. Pick the one role that will relieve the most pressure this quarter and start there. Hiring a team in order lets each new person settle in, prove the workflow, and help onboard the next hire, which is far smoother than absorbing five new people in the same week. The total budget tells you the destination. The sequence tells you the route.
For each role, write a short scope before you start: the outcomes you want in the first ninety days, the tools the person will use, and the hours of overlap you need with your team. Clear scopes are what turn a budget line into a real hire, and they make a shortlist arrive faster because a provider knows exactly who to look for. If you are unsure whether a role should be full-time, start with the part-time version of the work and expand once the fit is proven. Building a team this way keeps your risk low while still removing the work that is slowing the company down.
Finally, decide how you want to run the team. This calculator uses a planning rate for talent plus managed sourcing, vetting, launch, and ongoing support. It does not determine the contract, invoice, legal-employer, payroll, tax, or country-level compliance structure. Confirm those responsibilities and charges in writing for every market. With a budget, a sequence, and a support model in hand, you can bring a clearer hiring plan to a provider.
Methodology
Transparency matters when the budget is one you will defend to a co-founder or a board, so here is exactly how the numbers are produced. Each role on the team is priced with the same engine that powers the single-role hiring cost calculator, then the roles are added up. The US figure for each seat starts from a median base salary for that role, drawn from public US compensation benchmarks, and then applies the overhead profile you select. The lean profile adds 25 percent for light benefits and a remote setup, the standard profile adds 40 percent for typical benefits, payroll taxes, and tooling, and the fully loaded profile adds 60 percent for rich benefits, office space, and recruiting. The result is a total cost of employment per seat, not just a salary line.
The Latin America figure for each seat uses a typical planning rate for talent plus managed staffing support, adjusted by a country index so markets that tend to run lower or higher than the regional average are reflected. The team total is the sum of every seat. The displayed annual gap is the modeled US team total minus the nearshore planning total, and the three-year figure projects that gap across thirty-six months. Add engagement-specific payroll, tax, benefit, legal-employer, and compliance charges before relying on the result as total team cost.
These are planning estimates, not quotes. Real compensation varies with seniority, English level, niche skills, and the exact scope of each role, and the right number for your team can land above or below the model. Treat the output as a credible starting range that helps you decide whether and how to build. When you are ready to commit, a scoped quote will confirm the figure for the specific roles and people you hire.
Questions
It depends on the roles and team size, but the calculator often places a four-person nearshore support, admin, and finance team around 8,000 to 11,000 US dollars per month for talent plus managed staffing support. An engineering pod runs higher. This is a planning rate, not a country-specific payroll, tax, benefit, or legal-employer quote. Add engagement-specific charges before treating it as total cost.
The planning model often shows a large gap against modeled US employment cost because local labor-market rates are lower. The final savings depend on the roles, countries, employment structure, and separate payroll, tax, benefit, legal-employer, and compliance charges. Use the result as a shortlist input, not a binding savings promise.
Start with the work that is slowing your team down today. For most founders that is an assistant to protect their time, customer support to handle the queue, and a bookkeeper to keep the numbers clean. As you scale, common next additions are sales development reps, marketing support, and engineering. The calculator includes ready-made team templates for each of these patterns so you can start from a sensible shape and adjust.
The US side uses an overhead profile you select, which layers payroll taxes, benefits, equipment, software, and recruiting on top of base salary. The Latin America side uses a planning rate for talent plus managed staffing support. It is not a country-specific payroll, tax, benefit, or legal-employer quote. Confirm those responsibilities and charges in the written engagement before relying on the comparison.
Yes. Many US companies hire across several markets to reach the deepest talent for each role. The calculator models one market at a time so you can compare, for example, an engineering pod in Argentina against the same pod in Mexico. The contract, invoice, legal-employer, and payroll structure depends on the provider and written engagement for each market.
The figures are directional planning estimates built from public US salary benchmarks and typical nearshore managed rates. They are designed to help you build a credible budget and business case, not to serve as a binding quote. Real pricing depends on seniority, English level, niche skills, and the exact scope of each role. Request a scoped quote to confirm the figure for the specific team you want to build.
Ready To Move
LavaStaff helps you scope, source, vet, and launch a nearshore team that works your hours. Share your roles and we will bring you a shortlist. On managed engagements, LavaStaff handles payroll and compliance, directly or through a vetted EOR partner depending on your needs.